Artifacts > Project Management Artifact Set > Iteration Assessment > rup_itass.htm
<Project Name>
Iteration Assessment
Version <1.0>
[Note: The following template is provided for use with the Rational Unified Process. Text enclosed in square brackets and displayed in blue italics (style=InfoBlue) is included to provide guidance to the author and should be deleted before publishing the document. A paragraph entered following this style will automatically be set to normal (style=Body Text).]
Revision History
Date |
Version |
Description |
Author |
<dd/mmm/yy> |
<x.x> |
<details> |
<name> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
1.3 Definitions, Acronyms and Abbreviations
2. Iteration Objectives Reached
4. Use Cases and Scenarios Implemented
5. Results Relative to Evaluation Criteria
Iteration Assessment
[The introduction of the Iteration Assessment should provide an overview of the entire document. It should include the purpose, scope, definitions, acronyms, abbreviations, references, and overview of this Iteration Assessment.]
[Specify the purpose of this Iteration Assessment.]
[A brief description of the scope of this Iteration Assessment; what Project(s) it is associated with, and anything else that is affected or influenced by this document.]
[This subsection should provide the definitions of all terms, acronyms, and abbreviations required to properly interpret the Iteration Assessment. This information may be provided by reference to the project Glossary.]
[This subsection should provide a complete list of all documents referenced elsewhere in the Iteration Assessment. Each document should be identified by title, report number (if applicable), date, and publishing organization. Specify the sources from which the references can be obtained. This information may be provided by reference to an appendix or to another document.]
[This subsection should describe what the rest of the Iteration Assessment contains and explain how the document is organized.]
[Acknowledge the success you reached in the iteration.]
[How did the iteration run according to plan? How well was the budget met?]
[List the use cases and scenarios that were implemented.]
[Assess the results of the iteration relative to the evaluation criteria that were established for the iteration plan: functionality, performance, capacity, and quality measures.]
[Refer to the test results.]
[For example, changes in requirements, new user’s need,and competitor’s plan.]
[Identify problem areas that need to be reworked in upcoming iterations.]